Keep the real inquiry
Preserve audience, decision use, scope, time horizon, exclusions, access, and evidence burden before retrieval begins.
Bounded deep research
Evidence with receipts.
Omnara turns a consequential question into an inspectable campaign: inquiry, searches, source states, evidence notes, claims, contradictions, coverage, citations, budgets, stopping, and resumption remain distinct.
Standalone public edition 1.0.0 | MIT License | Individual skill source, not a universal plugin claim
The product
Research custody from question to handoff.
For analysts, researchers, investigators, product and policy teams, and anyone whose decision deserves more than a pile of search results.
Count states honestly
Discovered is not inspected. Opened is not deeply read. A full evidence note earns that stronger state.
Bound the report
Claims, contradictions, gaps, citations, limitations, budgets, refresh triggers, and resume points travel with the prose.
Campaign loop
Breadth discovers the field. Depth earns the claims.
Frame
Stabilize inquiry, use, scope, freshness, authority, and burden.
Map
Define coverage loci, explanations, source ecosystems, and disconfirming questions.
Read
Ledger candidates, deeply read the evidence-bearing subset, and write notes.
Reconcile
Build claim and contradiction ledgers; pursue decision-relevant gaps.
Audit
Check citation mechanics and semantic support separately, then hand off limits.
Inputs and outputs
Make the decision legible on both sides.
Useful inputs
Question, audience, decision use, scope, time horizon, required evidence, exclusions, access authority, budget, and deliverable.
Inspectable outputs
Research brief, query/source/claim ledgers, evidence notes, coverage matrix, contradiction map, digest, report, audit dispositions, counts, limits, and resume point.
Honest boundaries
It improves custody. It does not manufacture certainty.
Omnara does not guarantee truth, exhaustive coverage, source access, fixed scale, semantic entailment, professional advice, or host activation. Local helpers check structure and citation mechanics; a capable reviewer must still judge evidence and claims.